A history of the legitimacy of the administrative state

Legitimacy and the administrative state: Retrieved Sep 14 from https:

A history of the legitimacy of the administrative state


They have been current for more than 2, years and have not yet exhausted their usefulness. This suggests that humankind has not altered very much since they were coined; however, such verbal and psychological uniformity… Functions of monarchies A monarchy consists of distinct but interdependent institutions—a government and a state administration on the one hand, and a court and a variety of ceremonies on the other—that provide for the social life of the members of the dynastytheir friends, and the associated elite.

All such bonds are evident in symbolic and ceremonial proprieties. Because warfare was the main means of acquiring fertile land and trade routes, some of the most prominent monarchs in the ancient world made their initial mark as warrior-leaders. Thus, the military accomplishments of Octavian later Augustus led to his position as emperor and to the institution of monarchy in the Roman Empire.

Infrastructural programs and state-building also contributed to the development of monarchies.

Functions of monarchies

The need, common in arid culturesto allocate fertile land and manage a regime of fresh water distribution what the German American historian Karl Wittfogel called hydraulic civilization accounted for the founding of the ancient Chinese, Egyptian, and Babylonian monarchies on the banks of rivers.

The monarchs also had to prove themselves as state-builders.

A history of the legitimacy of the administrative state

Monarchy, therefore, rests on the cultural identity and symbolism of the society it represents, and in so doing it reifies that identity within the society while also projecting it to outsiders.

Perhaps most importantly, successful and popular monarchs were believed to have a sacred right to rule: Coming from these varying backgrounds, leaders first rose to power on the grounds of their abilities and charisma. Accordingly, monarchies proved capable of adapting to various social structures while also enduring dynamic cultural and geopolitical conditions.

Thus, some ancient monarchies evolved as small city-states while others became large empires, the Roman Empire being the most conspicuous example.

Sorry! Something went wrong!

Page 1 of 3.To Run a Constitution: The Legitimacy of the Administrative State [John A. Rohr] on grupobittia.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. In , the centennial year of the American Constitution, Woodrow Wilson wrote that it is getting to be harder to run a constitution than to frame one.

The context for Wilson's comment was an essay calling for sound principles of administration that would /5(3).

Milestones: – - Office of the Historian

Monarchy: Monarchy, political system based upon the undivided sovereignty or rule of a single person. The term applies to states in which supreme authority is vested in the monarch, an individual ruler who functions as the head of state and who achieves his or her position through heredity.

Tibetan history, as it has been recorded, is particularly focused on the history of Buddhism in grupobittia.com is partly due to the pivotal role this religion has played in the development of Tibetan and Mongol cultures and partly because almost all native historians of the country were Buddhist monks.

The administrative state’s legitimacy crisis 2 But the nature of these problems makes it hard to believe they can be solved, especially on a timescale compre- hensible to normal political life. the legitimacy of administrative law jed handelsman shugerman* jerry l.

mashaw, creating the administrative constitution: the lost one hundred years of american administrative law (). a hitchhiker's guide to the Tennessee Indian Affairs' Commission, an unofficial website dedicated to information about the past, present and future of Tennessee's state agency dedicated to .

History - Oxford Handbooks