Instruction is delivered in incremental steps; you accomplish one skill before beginning the next. This way you gain mastery and confidence as you move through the program. In addition to welding skills, the NPC program teaches leadership and employability strategies such as career planning, job search basics and how to interview. You develop techniques to enhance your critical thinking and problem solving abilities.
These social programs include things like nutritional assistance, unemployment, social security, commodities, grants and loans for school, governmentally funded health care, and more. Some people say that recipients of these types of governmental help should be required to undergo drug testing. But what are the pros and cons of drug testing welfare recipients.
Here, we will look at both the pros and cons of drug testing welfare recipients by giving you both sides. Pros Those who fall on the pro for side as far as the pros and cons of drug testing welfare recipients use several compelling arguments.
These include the fact that this move could possibly save the government money by taking drug addicts off welfare programs. Some also see it as extra incentive for those in lower socioeconomic classes to stay off drugs in the first place.
Still others reason that since those who regularly work could be drug tested at any time due to their jobs, so those receiving welfare should have to undergo the same testing. Cons One could also argue that there are several cons of drug testing welfare recipients.
A few believe that this is purely discrimination against the poor, who most often receive these benefits. They argue that since some people have jobs where they are never drug tested and are sometimes very highly paid, even that poor people should not have to undergo testing.
This group also often says that such an argument is basically telling poor people that they have no right to be happy, or experience the full spectrum of human experience, whereas those not on welfare who are not drug tested at their jobs can do this freely.
The Future In the future, drug testing may or may not be required for welfare recipients. Truly, it is up to the citizens, at large, to determine what they feel are the most important pros and cons of drug testing welfare recipients.
Then, you can speak for your side by voting for politicians who support your side of the argument. In this way, your opinions will, hopefully, be reflected in any legislation that is passed pertaining to this issue.NPC offers a full spectrum of welding coursework from foundational safety and metal preparation to basic and advanced courses in GMAW, GTAW, SMAW, weld quality, plastic and aluminum welding and more!
The program is designed to enable students to earn national certification for their welding skills from the National Center for Construction Education and Research (NCCER) and the AWS, the.
The ACT test is a curriculum-based education and career planning tool for high school students that assesses the mastery of college readiness standards. Welfare Drug Testing Persuasive Speech Essay.
B. Pages:7 Words This is just a sample. To get a unique essay. regarding the legality and morality of pre-assistance drug testing. This report is intended to familiarize the reader with the history of welfare reform; the histories of drug testing in regards to assistance eligibility; and.
In competitive sports, doping is the use of banned athletic performance-enhancing drugs by athletic competitors. The term doping is widely used by organizations that regulate sporting competitions. The use of drugs to enhance performance is considered unethical, and therefore prohibited, by most international sports organizations, including the International Olympic Committee.
Drug Testing For Missouri Welfare Recipients - On 30 January , the Missouri House of Representatives passed a bill and sent it to the senate that would require drug testing for those receiving state Temporary Assistance for Needy Family (TANF) funds.
This essay delves deeply into the origins of the Vietnam War, critiques U.S. justifications for intervention, examines the brutal conduct of the war, and discusses the .